hes NEVER publicly signed a signature from a know satoshi wallet that could simply be verified by anyone that wants to check.
i can fully buy and understand the fact hes lost the wallets most of us have been there at some point. but the big thing for me is satoshi has been around several times to say no this person isnt me. if DR wright is satoshi he could sign into his account on any platform and simply say see this is me.
Here's the thing though - proof of possession of a specific private key or knowledge of the login details to a specific account does not prove identity. It only proves ownership. It is a necessary prerequisite to discussing the claims of "X is Satoshi", but it is not sufficient proof by any means. As I said in my first post above,
if you can sign a message
then we will take you seriously enough to examine your claim that you are Satoshi, but it is not a foregone conclusion.
Now look at all the provable lies CSW has told, all the silly tricks he has tried to pull to "prove" he is Satoshi which have been easily debunked, all the times he has been wrong on even some of the most basic technical aspects of bitcoin, all the times he has shown complete incompetence in terms of programming, coding, math, etc., all the plagiarism he has committed, and so on. Even if CSW could sign a message, the far more likely situation would be that he had somehow stumbled upon or stolen Satoshi's private keys.
We have mountains of proof that CSW is not Satoshi, and none of that would change based on the possession of a private key.