I'm curious about this:
Why is everyone complaining about this site people who will play tennis? is there anyone who played something else like soccer?
I'm just curious to know
The discussion about live table tennis is because most of the complaints in this thread are about it. Several previous posts explain how users are taking advantage of the delay in updating results. Whether betting knowing the result is a scam or not, you must decide individually.
We do not discuss about other sports as there are no complaints about them.
I am not surprised because most gamblers always look for loop holes of a platform in order to cheat on them, and if they are cut it becomes an attack. The player will come out to lament a out how unfair they are treated. They can even add some lies to make the story interesting. I am not always move by what I see on the net because many are just lies. We can always make our research to know what is true and wrong.
so the problem is in the tennis, if that's the case I see that there may be room for cheats but why the site didn't fix it so don't have problems in the future? it seems that the site likes to have ten accusations per month and does little or nothing to resolve the accusations that way the site will go bankrupt because no one will use this site for some time when everyone realizes this serious situation
In fact, I'd like to know that too. The only logical explanation for me may be that it is simply more profitable for them to leave games, and because they have a sensible detecting system, they catch all those trying to cheat. It is possible that the cheaters managed to earn from it before, and now they can not, hence the dissatisfaction and so many complaints.
Well yeah, at least in the short term, it's more profitable when every time they offer a bad line they just freeze (steal) the entire balance of anyone that gives them action on it. Of course in the long run , acting ethically is more profitable than unethically.
In the end, bad line or not, the book offers action, the players decide which action to accept. The book tries to offer the worst possible lines that they think the most players will accept. And players look to take lines that they view as the most profitable. It's a game, both sides are always trying to win.
If the book offers a bad line, they should obviously expect players to take it. When this happens, it does not make it ok for the book to take the players entire balance. If they do, it's stealing, plain and simple. A players balance belongs to the player. Just because the book has access to it doesn't give them any more rights to it than if it were physically in the players pocket.
I understand you way of thinking and it is perfectly normal. But I guess you are missing one thing.
1xbit gives back the user's deposit even if he was caught on cheating.
The problem in this case is that users who try to cheat open multi accounts on 1xbit, and a deposit can only be returned once.