I think nutildah did get a bit of special consideration here, as he was warned multiple times before he got temp-banned. Other members who don't have a reputation, or who are shitposters, or who have negative trust might have been banned much sooner. I can't say that's 100% true of course, but I don't think the mods were quick with the ban hammer as far as nutildah goes.
That makes sense only if nutildah absolutely had to be banned and the only question was whether to do it quickly or not so quickly.
Is the forum better or worse with that thread moved and nutildah banned?
Anyone who can honestly say "yes" to the above question without resorting to slippery slope fallacies and shit like that has seriously impaired judgement IMO.