This sounds like a complete clusterfuck if you want my honest opinion. First of all, there should have been plans in place for what was to be done with the donated funds
before receiving any donations, and that thread you linked to is over a year and half after the charity fund was started--but correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, cabalism13 is basically asking whether the donations should be played with by converting
BTC-->whatever and trying to time the market. That's tantamount to gambling with other people's kind gestures, and that isn't right.
If funds were really transferred to Binance in order to stake coins, that's another colossal fuckup IMO. I don't know if that happened or not, but it does appear there's evidence of it. That's another example of gambling with charity funds, and that shouldn't be done. And why would the funds be split up? I don't get that part at all.
In other words, to the last part of you post above, I'd say yahoo62278 is on the edge of making some serious accusations--I hope I'm wrong, but this whole thing smells kinda funny to me.