⭐ Merited by dkbit98 (5) ,NeuroticFish (5) ,LoyceV (4) ,o_e_l_e_o (4) ,mikeywith (2) ,HeRetiK (1) ,BlackHatCoiner (1) ,SFR10 (1) ,Trofo (1)
Payments for this week have been sent, using an exchange rate of 1 BTC = $49080. (36e25527cea7bbb2d6a2d0f8f3e191b031dead04d692b89f12dbe9d073a0116b)
Have you ever considered that posting more than 100 characters does not imply that the post was paid? I do more than just check if a post is above 100 characters
Managing participants based on opinions is something that I do not ever plan on doing. People may (and do) share different views than me and that's perfectly okay - the most I can try to do is to convince them otherwise. Are you proposing that the standard should be that ChipMixer signature participants support anything that you (OgNasty) agrees with? If so, why would it make any sense to base it off of your perspective? I must have missed the memo where you setup an authoritarian government on the forum and began censoring alternate viewpoints.
If you'd like to report spammers, be my guest. I'm happy to listen to your concerns, and decide whether or not action should be taken. However, maybe try reporting someone that you don't have a personal vendetta against.
You really should increase the character count on this signature campaign. Look at all the shitposts from useless spammers and trust abusers like suchmoon just to earn money from this campaign:
Have you ever considered that posting more than 100 characters does not imply that the post was paid? I do more than just check if a post is above 100 characters
The fact trolls get paid money by ChipMixer to make posts like this shitting on other people's creations, in this case the richest man in the world trying to make human beings a multi-planetary species, is disgusting and insulting to this community. This campaign needs to do better. Maybe have some standards for ChipMixer signature participants.
Managing participants based on opinions is something that I do not ever plan on doing. People may (and do) share different views than me and that's perfectly okay - the most I can try to do is to convince them otherwise. Are you proposing that the standard should be that ChipMixer signature participants support anything that you (OgNasty) agrees with? If so, why would it make any sense to base it off of your perspective? I must have missed the memo where you setup an authoritarian government on the forum and began censoring alternate viewpoints.
If you'd like to report spammers, be my guest. I'm happy to listen to your concerns, and decide whether or not action should be taken. However, maybe try reporting someone that you don't have a personal vendetta against.