I searched YOUC thread --which also managed by BTCITA187-- and learned that both project had formed a partnership. A cursory glance at the last page gave me an impression that YOUC, however, seems to start abandoning their project.
Although all indication up to this point pointed to the direction that the accused are indeed doing a misconduct, I think we need to be sure we cover every side of the story, this email --I quote below-- is the entire length of the email body? What I wanted to know is whether there is a statement anywhere and at any point during your negotiation with TOKPIE/YOUC that there are certain terms and condition that has to be met for the lifetime volume assistance?
If there is a clear evidence that there were not any information about terms and condition for lifetime support, thus TOKPIE/YOUC is breaching the contract, I'll gladly support the flag.
pls google this issue. There were mutual blog posts between them about cooperation 7-9 months ago.
Although all indication up to this point pointed to the direction that the accused are indeed doing a misconduct, I think we need to be sure we cover every side of the story, this email --I quote below-- is the entire length of the email body? What I wanted to know is whether there is a statement anywhere and at any point during your negotiation with TOKPIE/YOUC that there are certain terms and condition that has to be met for the lifetime volume assistance?
If there is a clear evidence that there were not any information about terms and condition for lifetime support, thus TOKPIE/YOUC is breaching the contract, I'll gladly support the flag.