Hello guys, we completely don't agree with the blaming man!
CryptorClub cheated Tokpie and its users in two ways:
1. He got the listing service a long time ago (April 25):
https://tokpie.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019702238-The-Green-Token-GREEN-Listed-on-Tokpie and had not made any blames until now. Why is he blamed now? Because he changed the token network from Ethereum to the Matik that has never been supported by Tokpie.
2. So, he decided to blackmail us by requiring a refund of 100% first. When we refused to satisfy such a ridiculous request, he wrote this post and requested a 50% refund.
This man is a blackmailer!
Regarding listing on trackers, we made everything from our side, but this man simply could not satisfy trackers' requirements in terms of his project quality.
Bottom line.- Ask yourself why CryptorClub has been silent since April 25?
- Ask yourself why Tokpie has already listed over 120 projects for the last 12 months and only this man is blaming us?
- We kindly ask bitcointalk's admins to close this fake blaming post and red flag CryptorClub user.
[...]
Now that both party is here, discussion and investigation should be easier.
BTCITA187, I'd like to give you a mind-blowing information: email screenshot works both ways. Just like how
CryptorClub could provide history of email exchanges between them and TOKPIE, you can too.
As you claimed that they have been silent since 25 April, and only now started to complain in order to blackmail a refund, can you provide a screenshot of email history indicating that it is indeed true that your last email with them is as how they provide in the evidence, and there were not any other emails in between April and December, whether from their side complaining about the broken agreement, or from you asking anything --thus, proving and favoring your side that you've delivered the product as promised and there were no issue up to earlier this month.
Second, is there a logical, acceptable, or whatever reason you can provide that explains why you stopped the lifetime volume assistance support? No matter who blackmailed who --I'd like to point out that YOUC, your partner, is also blackmailing CryptorClub, threatening that they'll have a very bad review that'll appear on google's top 10-- a deal is a deal, you promised a volume assistance that's free for as long as the project live. Not only that, as per their claim, you also failed to deliver the promise where they'll be listed on CoinGecko, CMC, etc.
I couldn't care less about what other project said about you in the past. There are a lot of projects that started good and left the stage in the years that follow. Like YOUC, for example, and how their thread is now abandoned. So, what is your version for these two accusation points I state above?