I have to praise the reaction to restore their trading pairs. it is much better than blackmailing and responding negatively
Tons of hours were spent to provide them with agreed services. Everything was done from our side (trading, vol assistance, promotion, and guidance on what to do to pass trackers). Might be you think we should re-develop their web, find team members for them and do all other development staff. Appearing on trackers is mutual co-working. We did our part, they did not. So, what refund they are asking for now!
you still haven't given me clear answers. If you promise them listing on CMC, CoinGecko and whatever, have you done that part of the deal?
Might be you think we should re-develop their web, find team members for them and do all other development staff. Appearing on trackers is mutual co-working. We did our part, they did not. So, what refund they are asking for now!
no, you don't need to fix their infrastructure, but you should pay attention when accepting similar projects. acceptance of everything only degrades the quality of your service, I guess now you understand why some projects will never come to a bigger exchange, even if they want to pay.
1. Please look at the offer:
https://ibb.co/LzkZMPd. It's clearly said "Listing on CMC
after traction turning on." CMC has not yet enabled the traction. That's why we said it in the offer.
2. To pass Coingecko we provided them with trading, vol assistance, promotion, and guidance on what to do to pass Coingecko. But Coingecko doesn't accept them because of their low web/project quality.
3. Also, we instructed them how to get Etherscan update:
https://ibb.co/JyKT5ZJ. Only token owners can submit such requests on Etherscan.