<...>
Since Little Mouse posted his thread before israt1@ did his yet the date of its last edit is after israt1@ last edited his thread, I can't 100% definitively confirm who copied who since I don't have access over the previous edits / original contents of either thread.
My archive confirms the original.
I'd like to add that I've seen escrow and signature campaign threads with copied lists of conditions too. Years ago I reported someone who copied a part of my service-thread to offer the same, and that didn't lead to a ban either.
To quote a part of my PM I sent to a user a while ago:
Archival sites that are connected to the forum somehow (e.g. was started by a Bitcointalk member to archive posts / threads) can only prompt us to investigate further but it's not something that IMO can be used as the core piece of evidence for a ban. Organizations as big and trustworthy as the Internet Archive could be used as the core piece of evidence, especially for cases where the archive is already of an external piece of content (e.g. the webpage a user plagiarised from). Again, however, it really depends on the moderator handling the case - one might find a link to the Wayback Machine as valid evidence while another may not (though he / she most likely won't mark the report as bad, but rather leave it for someone else to handle).
AFAIK there are no old archives of either thread on the Wayback Machine. As for the "escrow and signature campaign threads with copied lists of conditions", I can't really comment on that since I don't think I've handled any cases like yours.