Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: [WARNING] PENNY UTILITY TOKEN Plagiarized Whitepaper
by
rakec
on 17/12/2021, 22:53:22 UTC
I hope that proves above are enough to see that all of you are wrong.
Whitepaper is 1% of the project.
Code is 90%. So before you accuse someone to be a scam, you should check the code, right?

If we wanted to scam people, probably will make token in 5 minutes on some launchpad. I don't think that scammers are working 6 months on code to scam people.

How many project you know that done audit before private sale?
How many project launching first platform before presale?
How many multichain tokens have the staking, voting, proposals options in DApp? You are right 95% of them don't even have DApp for that.
How many multichain tokens have option to receive staking rewards on one network, while people moving tokens on 2 others? Probably none
How many multichain tokens have option to recognise TX?
How many multichain tokens have protocol validator for burning and minting tokens on another networks?
 

So accusing someone that is scam because he copy parts from whitepaper is fine.
But that could do 3rd grade kid. Maybe he will look for other details before he do what you have done.
I expected more from Hero and Legendary members on this forum.

Best Regards
Dejan