Proves for accusation that the project is a scam are sent  to moderators. Hope that proves enough to see that all of them are wrong.
Whitepaper is 1% of the project.
Code is 90%. So before anyone accuses someone of being a scammer, he should check the code, right?

If we wanted to scam people, we would probably make a token in 5 minutes on some launchpad. I don't think that scammers are working 6 months on code to scam people.

How many projects do you know that have an audit done before private sale?
How many projects launching the first platform before presale?
How many multichain tokens have the staking, voting, proposals options in DApp? You are right 95% of them don't even have DApp for that.
How many multichain tokens have the option to receive staking rewards on one network, while people moving tokens on 2 others? Probably none
How many multichain tokens have the option to recognise TX?
How many multichain tokens have protocol validator for burning and minting tokens on other networks?
 

So accusing someone of a scam because he copied some parts from whitepaper is fine.
But that could do 10 years old kid. Maybe he will look for other details before he does what they have done.
I expected more from Hero and Legendary members on this forum.