Frankly, I currently don't have the time or the state of mind to answer the barrage of questions and analysis you are asking me to do above.
So you have time to hurl insults at anti-vaxxers and literally tell them to fuck off, time to base all your conclusions on emotional, personal experiences only, but you don't have time to do the research and answer my questions backed with real "science"- i.e., rebuttals with collected data, stats, and logical reasoning?
Someone close to me has just died of COVID-19, who could have been saved if he had been vaccinated. No, I don't have the time needed to do the barrage of tasks you asked me to, that even specialist scientists need months/years to do. On the other hand, I do have one Sunday to spend posting my story and commenting on replies, in the hope someone is helped by the discussion.
I even did an analysis using the numerical data YOU provided, which you miserably failed to refute -- a common tactic of those unable to respond with evidence: throw a ton of questions in place of a concise, meaningful and factual reply they are unable to provide.No, I didn't refute it at all.
In fact I said, let's assume that you are right and that the vaccines are indeed as SAFE as you say.
Then you prove, with science data and stats to support it, that they are EFFECTIVE. Like as in stopping infections, stopping or even slow transmission, stopping people from going into ICU and/or dying, and giving back civil liberties that have been forcefully taken away.
SAFE and EFFECTIVE. You can't just have one or the other, you have to have BOTH. The whole point of a vaccine. Remember?
And just like those pro-vaxxers who like to talk a bunch of nonsense, YOU cannot respond to my original questions asked with any meaningful "science" data to back it up.