I have had many chats with 2/3 of these members and this whole situation kinda deflated my opinion of them. As far as cabalism using 500$ idk if i'd tag him for that being as that's kinda what he did with the charity. All their events were helping communities/families in need. So in his mind he probably felt like he wasn't doing anything wrong. I messaged him over this whole situation and was telling him about my open heart surgery at the end of October this year, and his first response was he thought that I was messaging about maybe the charity helping me out with some funds. That was not the case, but I think that's how his mind works since he has been running the charity. Someone needs help, we as a community should help them. Obviously not everyone who cries "help me please" should be helped, but I think we could all agree that if a well known member needed a boost, we would all probably break our backs and do what we could. You guys can do as you wish, but I will only be tagging if funds were stolen/missing aside from funds used to help someone. I don't agree with his actions, but I can see what/how he was thinking.

Now on to the others, If 1 person is tagged then all 3 should be tagged. Cabalism13 for running the charity incorrectly and making bad decisions, bl4nkcode for showing a poor example of how an escrow should operate, and crwth for agreeing to go along with it.

What I really feel we should do is get with all 3 of these guys and do some kind of audit. We need to know what the balance was at the time of the split( need to verify this via blockchain), addresses involved so it can be checked, expenses for these "activities" they did(receipts apparently are not available, but couldn't we figure out the money spent on these activities by figuring out what was given and the price of each thing?), and finally the balance left. They need to combine what's left, convert to crypto, and send back to the escrow address.

Now let's assume we get this whole mess figured out. Should the charity remain open? Will these guys ever have the full trust of the community again so they could operate the charity if they ran it correctly?

These are my thoughts on this situation. I'm not trying to be soft and not tag anyone, i'm trying to be a little understanding since these guys are not just newbie douchebags. Obviously everyone is free to do as they feel is correct, but i'd like some opinions on my thought process here.