As for crwth I think he is clearly less at fault than the other two. If this were a trial for misappropriation of funds in a company, the most serious penalties would go to the boss (cabalism13) and the treasurer (bl4nkcode,) the employee would surely receive lesser penalty if he received any. Also I don't think we have strong evidence against him unlike the other two. In this case I will neither support nor oppose the flag and will stand by my neutral tag.
If this were a criminal trial (which obviously it's not,) then yes, I would be in agreement. But this is more like a civil suit where the proving liability, not guilt is the criteria. Which brings me to the part of your quote that I bolded: When someone is charged with handling other people's money (such as charitable contributions,) it's that person's responsibility to provide the evidence of where the money is going. Since crwth is guilty of not honoring that obligation, and in my opinion that's enough for a tag and flag.
The other issue that's worth addressing; all three of these members are still on DT1.
Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.