By the way, such images can be easily made up, faked or what's not?
You have provided some receipts, do they really prove anything? I really don't think so.
Yes but in our country (same with crwth) receipts often looks like that so I can attest that he is showing you the exact receipt that he did get from purchase. I don't think being grilled like this have some sort of chance to lie of what was being wanted by most of us here don't you think? Also it does prove something of their spent from the charity money, so I think that's a common sense it did prove something.
I also think that crwth joins the charity to help some people that needed funds. So in this kind of scenario everyone should at least give them some good points aside from the negative aspect of their transactions alone. But I understand that there should be a transparent document presenting those spent charity funds which I assume (loss, misplaced, or whatsonot). Anyway, clearly seeing some advance on their part to present some receipts.
Anyway, with the somewhat spotty evidence provided I have no reason to believe that crwth is at fault here. There seem to be significant amounts gone to the other two guys, so there is probably more work needed to untangle that part.
Maybe we just need to wait, but I have a question: Let say that some of the receipts or evidence were gone or cant be presented, is voucher acceptable for the audit or you think everyone would consider that as forging. Chances some of those receipts are probably lost due to some reason right? What will be the judgement for that.