I see he does copy/paste replies all over the place. A new example:
Giving loans without collateral in the internet is like giving money to a beggar without expecting any returns.
While the subject is a wet-dream for addicted gamblers and impulsive traders, the ones providing them usually have put in some catch in the deal that allows them to hunt down the borrower.
For a small-cap investor being on the lender side of flashloans would be a type of gambling.
However the link posted by the OP is about a flashloans platform being exploited. Personally, I have never been a fan of DeFi projects, specially which are trying to run lending and borrowing without DeFi itself being regulated. But I guess there is a demand for such loan sharking.
and the plagiarist:
For a small-cap investor, lender participation in flashloans would be a form of gambling.
However, the link published by the OP is about using the flashloans platform. Personally, I've never been a fan of DeFi projects, especially those that attempt to engage in lending and borrowing without regulation by DeFi itself. But I guess there is a demand for that sort of thing.