DOGE recently had an intentional fork to fixed-reward blocks because multipools were snatching up the best random-reward blocks and leaving the poor ones for the DOGE miners.
regardless of the reason,wouldnt any floating XCP on a soon to be obsolete fork be a double spend risk? This is because when the fork is reconciled, any DOGE transactions automatically get back to what they should be, but how does the floating XCP get undone?