Time to lock this thread, @yahoo62278
I would lock this thread but I want to wait til the holidays are over and see if the other 2 pop in and give a reasonable explanation as to the facts and try to clear up any 8ssues users have.I had intended to make that my last post here, however, with your indulgence, I would like to point out a deep flaw in @Poker Player's Trolling of me here.
But first, this is what I wrote on their Trust Feedback page. It carries *neutral* weight. Likewise, I have never dispensed preemptive, nore retaliatory DT Trust against Poker Player.
I wrote:
| Poker Player | 2021-12-28 | I supported PP in their thread examining lightlord's recent behavior. Then, thread that looked at connections (linked by 3rd person) between PP & 2 other UID's. PP has chosen to turn my support of dkbit98 into a personal attack against myself *even though* I made no accusations against PP As I more than once told marlboroza: "Respect is a two way street" |
In this thread [Link] two users @dkbit98 and @The Pharmacist explore the possibility that Poker Player has an alt - namely naim027
In post 12, I wrote this:
2 Accounts Connected:
minairia3, naim027,
About 27 hours after applying for a signature campaign, naim027 changed their wallet address from bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv to 3Q24Jvtg2Lr5SyQE4RaCYtNTFxFwY44Sip - naim027 applied to join a full three weeks after minairia3 used that wallet address in a TOTALLY DIFFERENT SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN.
There are literally only twelve posts between naim027's application and when @Hhampuz accepts it (just three hours after naim027 changes their post). No one in the twelve posts makes mention of the duplicated wallet address.
[OPEN] Roobet.com Signature Campaign | The Honest Online Casino | Full Members+ [Ninja]
it now reads:
[/size]
[OPEN] blender.io Signature Campaign | Sr./Hero&Legendary Members | - [Ninja]
minairia3, naim027,
About 27 hours after applying for a signature campaign, naim027 changed their wallet address from bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv to 3Q24Jvtg2Lr5SyQE4RaCYtNTFxFwY44Sip - naim027 applied to join a full three weeks after minairia3 used that wallet address in a TOTALLY DIFFERENT SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN.
There are literally only twelve posts between naim027's application and when @Hhampuz accepts it (just three hours after naim027 changes their post). No one in the twelve posts makes mention of the duplicated wallet address.
[OPEN] Roobet.com Signature Campaign | The Honest Online Casino | Full Members+ [Ninja]
Quote
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=298644
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 209
BTC address for payouts: bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 105
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 209
BTC address for payouts: bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 105
it now reads:
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1187984
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 209
BTC address for payouts: 3Q24Jvtg2Lr5SyQE4RaCYtNTFxFwY44Sip
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 113
First time apply on Signature Campaign. Excited
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 209
BTC address for payouts: 3Q24Jvtg2Lr5SyQE4RaCYtNTFxFwY44Sip
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 113
First time apply on Signature Campaign. Excited
[/size]
[OPEN] blender.io Signature Campaign | Sr./Hero&Legendary Members | - [Ninja]
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=298644
Current amount of posts (including this one): 2111
Amount of merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 2
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv
[/size]Current amount of posts (including this one): 2111
Amount of merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 2
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1qguayhqyd774w6sg83p7ehexqe3fp3r5ds0a8kv
Look at the whole post in one reduced go - no mention of Poker Player.
That can only mean I do not consider Poker Player connected to either of the two listed in my post.
Therefore, when Poker Player tells you that I consider Poker Player to have alts, Poker Player knows that to be not true. i.e. a lie. Poker Player is lying to you and Trolling me.
How naim027 can also be under that same misunderstanding makes you wonder - doesn't it? [link 1][link 2]
18 months ago I identified a cluster of UID's who had previously engaged in merit swapping and DT trust swapping (even passwords being changed in the same 24 hour period) which elevated asu and theyoungmillionaire into positions to then scam lots of money. Lots of naval gazing ensued as people decried they never saw that coming.
For those of you who did not follow the links in this quote, allow me to quote the relevant section:
This is a working theory.
I am investigating a connection between theyoungmillionaire and finaleshot2016 who both changed their passwords within 24 hours as I stated in this post and this follow-up post. jademaxsuy along with crwth have extensively swapped merits with theyoungmillionaire and finaleshot2016 while in @LoyceV's Default Trust List Week 05 jademaxsuy removed their trust of theyoungmillionaire only to add finaleshot2016 and crwth in Week 06
In addition, I have a working theory that theyoungmillionaire has at least four or five alts being jademaxsuy, finaleshot2016, Squishy01, GDragon, Strufmbae, Silent26, crwth and Maus0728 based on their default trust lists activating the same week for most, or a couple of weeks later (with the same list) in the case of the latter couple of UID's. As at week 76 all or most still trust theyoungmillionaire and each-other.
Since my first post, Maus0728 has removed their trust of theyoungmillionaire but continues to trust all others (the group in what seems to be a DT abuse cluster).
I am investigating a connection between theyoungmillionaire and finaleshot2016 who both changed their passwords within 24 hours as I stated in this post and this follow-up post. jademaxsuy along with crwth have extensively swapped merits with theyoungmillionaire and finaleshot2016 while in @LoyceV's Default Trust List Week 05 jademaxsuy removed their trust of theyoungmillionaire only to add finaleshot2016 and crwth in Week 06
In addition, I have a working theory that theyoungmillionaire has at least four or five alts being jademaxsuy, finaleshot2016, Squishy01, GDragon, Strufmbae, Silent26, crwth and Maus0728 based on their default trust lists activating the same week for most, or a couple of weeks later (with the same list) in the case of the latter couple of UID's. As at week 76 all or most still trust theyoungmillionaire and each-other.
Since my first post, Maus0728 has removed their trust of theyoungmillionaire but continues to trust all others (the group in what seems to be a DT abuse cluster).
Again, when PP says I consider these users to be alts, Poker Player knows this to be not true.
A lie.
Poker Player is Trolling you with what they know to be a lie about me and what I have said.
How do we know this:
Simple.
This is a working theory.
Timelord2067 distrusted crwth before today. In the latest trust list update from last Saturday it appears like this.
That's correct. My distrust of crewth is preemptive DT distrust as I and others have preemptively distrusted both cabalism13 and bl4nkcode in the last week.
Quote
And because today crwth distrusted Timelord2067 he says this is DT Trust abuse. Is that so? Because if so he is a total lunatic. I thought it was about the consumption of potent marijuana or hallucinogenic drugs, but now I doubt if it is not because he is not taking medication for schizophrenia or something like that.
Correct. crewth, having been attacked by a preemptive DT negative by me has retaliated against me with distrust. Why? Because Poker Player told many lies against me when I asked the hard questions.
13 months ago @LoyceV pulled apart Poker Player's numerous abusive attacks [LINK], so this is not a new thing, this deep seated anger inside Poker Player.
@crwth: Where are cabalism13 and bl4nkcode ??
They pocketed over half a bitcoin each - what did you get?
The three options are:
All three are alts.I discount this scenario due to the fact there had to be collaboration between at least two parties in promoting the "charitable work" being done.- There are two users. I favor this scenario in which two users, for example cabalism13 and crwth are alts are able to persuade the other person (two votes to one) how to spend the funds.
There are three users.Two users might be able to persuade a third user for some of the time, however, the third person will at some-point form a differing opinion and voice concerns. That hasn't happened.
I see @theymos has been online in the last six hours.