Hi again.
It's clear to me that there is significantly more emphasis placed on development of features and progress towards functional goals than there is on the fundamentals of the Mastercoin system (is Master Protocol applicable here?).
Johnston - could you please set this guy straight? David has all the answers for you.
It is easy to sit around and point to all the shortcomings. Big deal. I can detail all the places I'd like MSC protocol to be better too. But, with the resources they have, they are too busy building the thing.
Imagine a Ferrari - a high performance serious piece of gear. They are busy making the drive train balanced. Then some dick comes up and says: "Hey guys, the paint isn't very nice!" Dude? What are you thinking? "Documentation"? Who's got time for that now? They are all very freaking busy staying up all night to get the thing balanced. They don't care about the paint. That is why Masterchest is so ugly. If you want nice paint, go to NXT. That is all they have.