I didn't know about user franky1 who was actually considered a troll before you created this thread. There are 3 negative tags ^[trusted] it receives before you start painting it down to 4 negative tags, but I really don't see if it's the effort it takes to remove any of the old users on this forum.

We always get advice from forum contributors that if you don't agree with someone's post then you can cite it for justification so as not to be misleading. If indeed the user continues to spread lies ^[trolling] which could cause serious problems in the forum, then the post and profile should be reported for review. So far there are 2 options I can think of regarding the user you are referring to, ignore the profile and posts or report more posts that you find misleading.

I just checked how many posts the mod has removed for its profile, but 77 posts is too few if people actually report the post assomething wrong. Whatever it is, I'm just standing somewhere ^{[neither confirming nor blaming].} This is really a case that needs to be looked at more than whether you agree or disagree about free speech.