Yes, but the moderators should not be the truth gatekeepers either. Would you really want that? To me that sounds very authoritarian
If you ask me I prefer having some people who constantly throw into confusion outa here than leaving this place in its chaotic mercy. You aren't either absolutely totalitarian or disgustingly libertarian. History has shown exaggerations fail. As I said, everything in moderation. We're a forum after all.I'd like to see him get some support for whatever mental disorder he's got going on
Yeah... About that 
Again, die in a fire plz. Absolute waste of oxygen.
As for this, I'm fully agreed:
Eventually, once you've debunked all the lies, he just resorts to semantics and wordplay. And by that point no one is going to be convinced by what he's saying anyway.
However, as I've underlined above, I'm more discouraged than encouraged to pay this man attention by starting all those wrangles. To reach the point where he starts resorting to semantics and wordplay, a page of wall-sized posts is required. By knowing there's a high chance for the discussion to be removed after all this mess, I don't even take the time.Ah, OK I've just realized that there is no authomatic system, it is just that if he publishes there his posts will be moved or deleted.
From what I've noticed, he's banned in theory, but in practice he can disrupt a lot. The existence of the post you've linked proves he's not completely banned from that board, but instead confusing the users with the same shit.however, I don't think he is posting in bad faith.
How do you interpret bad faith? I can characterize him an immature, inhibited scum the least.