im not the one trying to ban users.
I don't think you should be banned from the forum as a whole. But I am curious. Does the fact that some people would prefer to see you banned give you any pause for thought about how you conduct yourself?
if faketoshi and his altnetBSV desciples wanted me banned for calling them out. would i think im the problem. no.
.. same applies to other altnet bunnies, chums
If there were a topic debating my continued future here, I'd be thinking "Shit, I didn't realise I was pissing people off that much. I'm going to rethink my behaviour". Does any such thought along those lines even register in your brain?
when out of millions of registered users, its only the same dozen altnet bunnies being angry.. i think maybe im just poking the correct bear cave. im not the one thats part of a group that done a mandatory fork
But you are.
There's no such thing as a "mandatory fork" in Bitcoin.
forks happen without the need for every node user to form consensus. this is done by rejecting old style blocks to only accept new block formats. thus the only blocks that propagate are the new style. this causes old nodes still listening to blocks to get forked off..
you might want to check devs own wording of bip148
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0148.mediawiki
mandatory 'activation day flag" is mentioned a few times
my favoured buzzword is not madatory. my favoured word is segregation. apartheid. .. though segregation causes some confusion so i used mandated on purpose as its the DEVs chosen words
anyway, i know yet again even after reminding you after 20 times in the last 4 years..
the june/july 2017 drama about the NYA signalling threshold which activated the bip 148 that then disregarded old blocks to fake a 100% listing of bip9 segwit blocks
i even sent you the pretty picture many times
as for outnumbering?
To reiterate, you want things which other users do not want. And those users outnumber you. Deny it all you like.
there are literally thousands of topics about bitcoin scaling. none of which i created, which have posts by more then thousands of different users..
yet LN (advertised as the solution) only has a couple dozen topics created by the same group of people
the only reason you only see most of the people you read discuss LN is because of cabin fever. when a group of people are locked in a cabin. all they see is the people in the cabin. all they talk about is the things they have in common.
it ends up being stockholm syndrome. favouring those you are locked up with because its all you know and see
EG you only see me having no fear in debunking you guys. so you wrongly think i am the only one.