Right. franky1, from what I can tell, is an OG bitcoiner. I think he probably wants to see bitcoin succeed.
But, really, what does that mean? Alright, so we both have a common goal. However, each want it to succeed in another way. I personally see it succeeding as long as there's consensus for something whether that's big blocks or second layers. Franky disrespects that. He wants us to do as he says. He can't comprehend that what has distinguished Bitcoin is this significant detail.
For second layers, a consensus is not needed -- as long as the second layer is compatible with the rules, a second layer is possible, even if no one agrees with the implementation of the second layer.
I think franky1 has his own way of thinking about how to approach problems. This is likely different than many other people's ways to approach problems. I think it is franky1's goal to change people's minds via his posts. I cannot say that franky1 changed my mind, but I can say that I thought about things I might not have necessarily thought about had I not read his posts.