My disdain isn't because franky1 has different opinions.  It's because half the time their opinions aren't relevant.  

Imagine if you were having a conversation with someone about how you prefer your coffee/tea.  Then imagine I burst in ranting about how a kettle doesn't have to be used to boil water.  It could just as easily be used to boil urine.  My statement is factually accurate, despite the part where it's fair to assume that neither of you like your beverages with boiling piss in them.  So the point I'm raising is not remotely relevant to the conversation at hand.  

What if I then take it a step further and accuse you of dishonesty because you are failing to disclose to the person you were speaking with that kettles can be used to boil urine?  I declare that it's somehow immoral to assume that coffee/tea would always made with water.  And then I then decide to disrupt every future conversation you have about hot beverages to remind everyone that kettles can be used to boil urine.

Do you see the problem?  It's completely obnoxious behaviour.

When a topic is posted in Bitcoin (water) Discussion, franky1 should not be derailing the conversation to talk about "other networks" (piss).