The description in my trust section is that this account belongs to Malubit, or that Malubit was paying me. Which is not true.
Malubit turned out to be a scam and I admit that it was a mistake to defend him. But the fact is, while I was defending him, he looks legit and was being attacked in a dishonest way.
Sure, you can use this as a valid argument against me, but these are two different situations.
In other words, you admit that you were wrong back then and that you continued to promote the scam casino despite numerous warnings from other forum members. But you refuse to acknowledge that you might be wrong this time too and continue to make bad arguments.
You could at least concede that there is a possibility that you are wrong. But you don't do this. You instead shoot down the evidence that 1xbit users have presented here by claiming that these are multiaccounts even though you have no evidence to support this. This is the same false logic as saying there is no evidence of scamming in 1xbit even though there are enough relevant accusations to qualify as proof for a significant number of respectable members of this forum that this is a scam casino.