I think you'll find, in the example you linked to the ONLY person to refer to it as "bitcoin 2.0" was YOU.  Stop projecting your psychosis onto others, please.



If the sender and the recipient both agree to use Bitcoin, where is the "exodus"?  The funds never leave the Bitcoin blockchain, you raving loon.  Why doesn't a single argument you present make an ounce of sense?

If anything, you are the one promoting other blockchains because you literally won't shut up about them while the rest of us are trying to talk about Bitcoin.  It is clear that LN can be used with other compatible blockchains.  But that is completely off-topic for the Bitcoin Discussion board.  Start a topic in the Altcoin Discussion board, because that's where it belongs. 

This is not a difficult concept.  Anyone is free to discuss LN when the sender and recipient are both using Bitcoin, because it's supported by Bitcoin's blockchain.  If you want to talk about LN being supported by other blockchains, it is not relevant and does not belong in Bitcoin discussion.

As a side point, you also fail to inform all the people you're trying to "save" from us "fangirls" that far fewer people use those other blockchains and their experience will likely be less favourable.  If you are permitted to continue derailing topics by talking about altcoins, then why aren't you making it clear to people that the chances of having a payment routed on Vertcoin's Lightning network is effectively less than 1%?  Oh look, suddenly it is you who are being the "utopian dreamer" and acting as though people will have the same experience on other blockchains.  Two can play at that game, shitweasel.