the issue is for every time i rebutt their altnet advertising, they just enter another debate of "franky1 wrong coz troll" (actually its them becoming the troll)

my remarks explain the concept of how things work on LN using references and things that can be backed up by code and real life stuff.. their remarks dont explain how it works(in their opinion). and just social drama queen how im wrong, without actually providing code

i fully understand im not making their advert campaigns easy for them.
i understand they dont like it.

but i can back up what i say with code, bips and quotes and block data
all they can do is insult and basically say "wrong because troll"(boring and non explanatory rebuttal of no substance)

i have nothing against them deciding they want to use an altnet. i have nothing against them playing around with millisats.
my only issue is them trying to convince others that LN is bitcoin.
in the same manner of saying a printer is the internet, just because a printer connects to a PC locally and a pc connects to the internet.

yea it sounds silly to call a printer the internet or call a printer internet layer2, or even call the internet printer layer 2
but thats their PR campaign. and its just sad how foolish they are about it.

i have actually on multiple occasions said if they explain the differences they would have a better campaign. but they declined to change and instead just cried over how im trying to show how LN is different and making people aware of the risks.

it has been a great laugh that they only call me a troll because someone they like called me a troll, because someone-of-someone they liked called me a troll. again just social drama posturing of no merit.
but it is good to use their own contradictions and admissions against them, even if they do forget 3 weeks later that they got debunked.

maybe if they can check their own opinion and stick to an opinion that can be backed up by code and hard data, without contradictions(flip flops) they might have a better narrative. instead of resorting to pages of social drama

in short. if they stick to facts and not social loyalty ass kissing of a certain group. then there would not be any social drama ending in pages of silly arguments