LN devs wrote the code, LN devs use the code for their features they want to offer..
Look on your github issue. The proposal has 2 likes and 1 dislike. This turbo feature wouldn't be mandatory and therefore the users would be responsible for its usage. And it's a dumb idea, to be honest. Do you see it getting recognized?
they are trying to put a voluntary feature of one software piece, into becoming part of the official BOLTS.
turbo(one use case of breaking the funding lock peg) has been promoting it and doomad has been loving the idea, he has even gone as far as jumping off the cliff in defence of it by saying i deserve some court claim harassment for speaking out about its flaws.
as you can see by the githum, its been trying to implement it into the BOLTS for 2 years. heck even you just said although many comments were against it. you just said the opposite by narrowing down on the '2 likes 1 dislike" narrative as if you want to make it seem acceptable (then later contradict by saying you think its a dumb idea.. but atleast your honest at that part)