-snip-
In Roobet's post we only see big multiplier wins, let's imagine how much he lost to get big profits?
Of course people will hide it and it can be more than a big multiplier or even more.
What is clear is that when we win with a multiplier the feeling of emotion will be slightly cured.
Maybe because showing a winning is more fun than showing how many losses suffered. You are right when playing and experience losing streak one big win even though it does not cover the amount losses experienced can give new spirit and will usually make players continue to play.
What is more "fun" doesn't really matter when we are talking about peoples livelihood. I know that you should not gamble with your livelihood, you should gamble with money that you can afford to lose, but even in that case you are showing something disingenuous since we can't all have those kinds of great big results.
So, basically what you are telling people is that the big wins are "possible" and that's true, they are possible, but you are also telling them how someone wins every day, as if they are the same person but we all know that one big win happens very rarely for everyone, so you end up with mostly losses. If you are going to make a realistic marketing, then it would be someone losing thousands of times (or winning small) and then having one big win. I get that marketing can't be done like that, so it makes sense but that is why some people go against the idea of showing only the big wins.