Evolution is real but there is some circumstance where evolution is not valid and to get to the bottom of this we need more than the scientists knowledge (because only the Person that creates the earth and the things that abide in it tell us the fact)
This statement seems self-contradictory. I understand that some people reject evolution because they believe in a religious creation... but I don't see how you can sit halfway and say evolution is true, but there is also a creator... it's an either/or question, surely?
If evolution is real (which it is), then the 'tree of life' diagram below is valid. Or is your position that God created a bacterium ~3b years ago, and then sat back and watched everything evolve from that origin? Not trying to be confrontational, just trying to understand how someone can reconcile the two viewpoints.
https://i0.wp.com/flowingdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/tree-of-life_2000.png?w=2000&ssl=1
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351015.msg57551868#msg57551868