I'm having the same issue, therefore I'm wondering if there's any way someone might skip some categories because I have no idea who or what to place as event of the year/fail event of the year. Is it necessary to fill up all of the categories?
icopress will correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think that it's mandatory to nominate members in all categories. Simply fill those that you are comofrtable with and that's about it. I might even leave some categories empty too, if I won't be able to find adequate candidates.
icopress will correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think that it's mandatory to nominate members in all categories.
Should the encouragement of this post by icopress "merit" be regarded as a positive answer to the question?
I would also like to leave some categories empty, because at the moment I don't know who I can suggest. For example, I was not interested in the topic of scams, so I don’t know who to choose for Best ScamBuster. I do not want to propose candidates just to fill the slot.
I believe that it is necessary to propose only those candidates who fit into the framework of the competition conditions and categories. And not so that just to name someone who has nothing to do with the nomination.
Perhaps, before the end of the voting, I will have time to study a little the topics in which I have gaps and will be able to fill in all the fields.