I'm talking about "Best Bounty Manager". Maybe add another title?
As I wrote
last year:
that's the problem with Voting like this: it's more of a
Recognition award than an award for actual accomplishments.
When it comes to "bounty managers", I expect the most active one to get most votes, while the campaign manager who rejects spammers won't be loved. Then again, bounty spammers usually don't have Merit so they can't vote.
Thank you for your clarification. I also had doubts about what criteria to evaluate them, but it was worth trying with the proposal of the idea.
[...] I'm talking about "Best Bounty Manager".
Even if you do not take into account that there is already a Craft Master category, do not forget that there are not so many managers on the forum, so the category you actually proposed would exist for one or two people,
[just read the description and you will understand that there is no need for an additional category].
Thanks for clarifying. Forgive me my inattention. You are absolutely right and convinced me. A separate category would be redundant.
I looked at the names of the nominations in this contest, but did not see the important title for almost every forum participant. I'm talking about "Best Bounty Manager". Maybe add another title? Bounty managers have been an integral part of bitcointalk for many years, and it would not be superfluous to nominate and encourage them too. Why not.
This is already included in a
Craft Master category as you can see in explanation below.
It's not only limited to managers but also to escrow, designers, etc, and you can see that most people voted for managers.
I already figured it out and thank you too.
We will assume that from now on my proposal to add a new category "Best Bounty Manager" is invalid due to the fact that there is already a category
"Craft Master".