-snip-
He can contact his bank to make a claim, they will request it from the receiving bank, and if everything is clean as he is claiming, money should return into his hands.
But as we can see here, with so many posts made, he never gave any details.....
I have studied your previous case through trust scoring links. It looks like you also have a habit of asking clients to send funds to bank accounts that you don't master (what you say belong to your "Verified Customers"). Have you done the same in this case?He can contact his bank to make a claim, they will request it from the receiving bank, and if everything is clean as he is claiming, money should return into his hands.
But as we can see here, with so many posts made, he never gave any details.....
Due to the high volume he was requesting, I was giving him sometimes funds from my other customers (customers that I had previously verified)
Nothing can really ensure the health of the account except the owner of his own. When your Verified client you can just make a dirty transaction or exceed the capacity of the transaction that is permitted without your knowledge that causes a locked account. If this happens, every time you want to solve a problem will always depend on your verified client effort how recovery is resolved.
-snip-
if it's not true what I'm saying, OP can make a RECALL from his side. And if the money was really received and used, the bank from my side would deny the request because of funds missing in the account or could deny also because of investigation running. The receiving bank would provide the reason anyway.
So I'm requesting to OP (who claims to own these "clean" funds) to make this RECALL, publish it here and inform us about the reply coming from the bank on my side.
To be honest, I am not too familiar with international bank transactions. In my logic, if @Steve6732 can RECALL, meaning the fund has been sent to your bank account, is it so?if it's not true what I'm saying, OP can make a RECALL from his side. And if the money was really received and used, the bank from my side would deny the request because of funds missing in the account or could deny also because of investigation running. The receiving bank would provide the reason anyway.
So I'm requesting to OP (who claims to own these "clean" funds) to make this RECALL, publish it here and inform us about the reply coming from the bank on my side.
ONLY AFTER THIS, I WILL POST FURTHER COMMENT. OTHERWISE, THIS CASE IS CLOSED FOR ME.
If you don't feel like you're cheating anyone, then be cooperative and don't leave this thread where we have bad thoughts about you.P.S:... If I was really a SCAMMER, what would you think what would have happened? What about the OP?
#FindTheError
#FindTheError
But the confidence score says otherwise. Anyone suddenly can be a scammer because of certain conditions, including me right?
Evidence is not only needed from @Steve6732, from your side too. And I think, video evidence will be more valid considering that web versions of accounts can be edited with page inspect touches