I checked
faq#depositbonus:
To set a bonus you need to specify your share that will define the leverage, aka credit, from DuckDice. The bigger balance allows you to place more bets, play with bigger stakes and as a result win much more. It works similar to margin trading.
I haven't done the math, but I'm wondering if this is true. The user can also lose more, and considering the player loses on average, "win much more" seems misleading.
Deposit Bonus increases your odds for higher win
Here too: I'd like to know if this is true (on a mathematical level). This also seems misleading.
DuckDice can not it all the time and will give the chance to participate only occasionally for a limited segment of players.
I think a word ("give"?) is missing. I would expect Terms to be absolutely clear.
Reasons to cancel Deposit Bonus:
Bonus Lost - when the Bonus Balance is spent before the wagering requirements are cleared.
Say I deposit 1 BTC and get a 1 BTC bonus. I play a bit, lose the 1 BTC bonus, and have 1 BTC left. According to the above, this would be a reason for me to cancel the Deposit Bonus. But if I do:
Return = Current Bonus Balance - DuckDice initial share
This would mean I get nothing! So I'm better off if I continue playing,
hoping I'll either increase my balance again, or reach the wagering requirement before my funds run out.
Or do you mean you call the full 2 BTC (including the 1 BTC I deposited) "Bonus Balance"? If that's the case, I'd say it's misleading.
I'm not a native English speaker, but while reading through the Deposit Bonus Rules, I get the feeling it needs proofreading.
Disclaimer: I'm not much into gambling, and I've never liked "deposit bonuses" because I know they're designed to make me lose more. So you can consider my input a bit of an "outsider" view on this, and the Terms are not as clear as I would have hoped. Ideally, I would want the Terms to be very easy to understand, and fair to the player without giving me the feeling the casino is trying to trick me into accepting sneaky Terms.