I asked you to explain the simple premise upon which you base your conclusion, but you can't even do that, instead you are deflecting and avoiding the simple question. Why is that?
Because they can't give you a valid answer. They're so sure it can be shut down, that they don't care how's going to happen. They're saying that Bitcoin is meaningless, I answered on why that's false, they denied it. They're saying that everyone can create bitcoins for free, I explained why this is also wrong, including phenomena like consensus, they also denied it. They're saying that Bitcoin is ponzi, I cleared up twice why that's a false assertion, but they disagree.
All these have been repeatedly told to them by
everyone. They even disagree that two individuals can deal with their medium of exchange, outside this debt-based utopia. There's nothing left, admit you're biased towards it and that no one can change your mind...
And yeah, it turns out they've being saying the same shit since 2017, under another pseudonym.