One of the reasons why I keep asking people who are supporting tokens or altcoins to tell me what their utility is in real world is not me trying to dictate how they should think but it is mostly my personal interest in the technology trying to figure out where it has gone after Bitcoin. Sadly I'm greatly disappointed in "alternatives" so far.
Me too, but I want to keep an open mind about it. I don't think that the future of the cryptocurrency movement as a whole is for Bitcoiners to throw garbage on everyone else and point fingers.
Unless they are like Craig or scammers who deserve it. And I am someone who is 90% in Bitcoin when it comes to crypto. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying you are doing that.
It doesn’t matter if there’s no value in it for you, what matters is it has value for it in the market.
Good point. Live and let others live. Speak up if you notice something is off and smells like a scam, advise and correct, but don't be like Steam.
What i wanted to emphasize isn't Steam banning blockchain-based games, but most popular comment/reaction which support the ban or stating that they hate blockchain-based game/NFT. It means many (or even most) gamers don't need/want blockchain or NFT on their game even with advantage it could offer.
Gaming needs to be visually attractive and appealing. Most of the times at least. Blockchain games look like something created in the 90s. The graphics are mostly awful. That could be one reason a larger part of the community doesn't like them. Still, I don't see the point in gamers supporting Steam to ban them altogether. If I want to play ugly looking games, leave me be. Imagine Steam deciding to ban all racing games and everyone who doesn't play them and hates those types of games supports that decision.