It is not true that 1xbit pays the people who defend them. There is no such requirement in signature campaign rules.
And yet, the people that defend them are almost exclusively being paid by 1xbit. And, as far as I'm aware, none of them are regular players there.
You have basically no experience dealing with 1xbit as a gambler, yet you're their most vocal defender, with nearly every single post you make on this forum is about 1xbit, and most of them are either defending 1xbit or attempting to discredit someone accusing them of scamming.
Do you just prefer arguing instead of spamming a few sentences of nonsense like most of the others in the campaign?
It is true that I don't have huge experience in online gambling, but I am constantly working on increasing my knowledge and experience in this subject. (However, I have a lot of experience in gambling in classic casinos)
I am not sure to what you refer in your post, but if you write about my opinion on 1xbit, so it is based on the fact that I have been paid regularly and fairly for many months. So what's my opinion should be? Of course it's good opinion.