⭐ Merited by The0ldl_lser (1)
A fool would not have been included in dt1 even once.
According to DT1-strength of 211 users in 113 weeks (weekly updates) (don't mind the outdated title), you've never actually reached DT1:Code:
,week:,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161
2263197,The0ldl_lser,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-4,-5
You can listen to trolls on the Russian board, but that only earns you exclusions.2263197,The0ldl_lser,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-4,-5
I don't want to get too far off the topic of this thread... but you do raise some decent points regarding various choices that users make regarding their forum activities that may well influence how they are perceived by other members and the extent to which they might inspire other members to trust them or to get involved in the formulation of alliances (to the extent that you believe that is helpful).
Regarding your above point about the majority of your forum activities, maybe you should provide a link to such thread? By the way, if you are referring to the analytics thread, that is a thread about various shitcoins, and the WO thread is about bitcoin.. so I would beg to differ if you consider that to be a thread that is "similar to WO" - even if you are "technically" correct to the extent that you have a loose definition of "similar." If you are referring to some other thread that is most of your forum involvement, then maybe a link would be helpful just to clarify what you mean?
I did a quick glance at your post history and you seem to be all over the place in terms of your posts, and I would not even proclaim that being "all over the place" as a bad thing - but just wanting to clarify if there is such a thread that is similar to the WO within the Russian Local.. and then to get some glances at the kinds of contributions (or not) that you are making).
And I often write drunken nonsense 
(Of course I won't now) For me, this forum is more entertainment and a way to have a good time.
(Of course I won't now) For me, this forum is more entertainment and a way to have a good time. If you identify that there is some problematic aspects to your post history, then for sure it is good that you are considering reforming your ways. I will say that in my observations, people are creatures of habits, so it can be a bit easier said than done to actually reform your ways.. because it takes quite a long time to change our inner inclinations, even in the event that we want to head in a change direction.
Since I have enough knowledge. "there's just nothing to say"
Actually, if you gain knowledge and experience in the forum and even with your involvement in crypto (or bitcoin), then there are surely a lot of things that can be said.. whether you come up with them on your own, or you use the topics, posts, discussions of others as springboards for your sharing of your knowledge and experiences. By the way, I would just like to mention that the mere fact that you have more knowledge and experience than some other members does not necessarily result in your being more correct than others in regards to the way that they might discuss their knowledge and experiences, so it surely takes some practice to get better in your ways of both interacting with others and attempting to communicate your knowledge and experiences that might be helpful to others or to yourself (another thing that I believe is that sometimes your participation in the forum does not need to be aimed at helping anyone other than yourself - or maybe your desire to work out some of your own ideas in a public way.. not everyone will agree with me about this particular point).
It all started from the moment when the next bounty cheater was exposed. The sockpuppets that icopress was talking about. The fact is that all his accounts were respected and technically advanced. He has been making the forum interesting for a long time. From all accounts. He was deservedly "painted" (red review). But there was a split of opinions - some users felt that it was too cruel (due to the low exchange rate of the ruble, he could earn "a lot of money") It was said something like - "a team of reporters-translators / hunters for cheaters" does not make the forum interesting. And "occupied" dt1. And they don't write much in Russian. Yes, of course, they are doing the right job. But interesting people are also needed. I supported this opinion. Probably after this dispute, I was supported by users with great "strength" So I was included in dt 1. Of course I then removed the sock puppets. It turned out something like a manifest, I'm sorry if this is an offtop. It's just a shame when they call you a fool, while at the same time reading the Russian thread in detail. I make it clear. In order not to look like a fool, as icopress is trying to present. And people like he. The whole gang. They know that you will not read with a translator. There is also a Russian specificity. For example, in Russia it is not customary to "report on someone". It's the same as in prison. That's probably why reviews are not popular. That's where the dislike of reporters comes from. "teams of translators-reporters/hunters" "occupied" dT1, people see this, now they believe to be included in dt1, for this you need to "knock" (denunciation). Therefore, there is no interest in studying the system of trust. DT1 "compromised" by "reporter-gangs". That's about what I said and I was supported
Surely, I do not know the details of the various posts that were made or the extent to which you may have taken some positions that caused you to lose trust from some members while gaining trust from other members. For sure, there are some personal choices involved to the extent that you get involved in support that might be considered political, cultural or maybe even the creation of alliances that may or may not cause you to end up within questionable territories. Of course, aspects of the trust system of the forum allows members to create alliances and to even state their alliances to the extent that they feel needs to assert reasons for such alliances. I do believe that many members in the forum are going to be trusted based more upon their own abilities to articulate the reasons for their taking a position rather than the mere fact that they have made alliances - even though for sure, it does not necessarily hurt if any of us might choose to align with other members who we believe tend to show good judgement overall - of course, cannot really escape some of the subjective aspects of these kinds of decisions - and even personal choices regarding whether any of us even feels any need to explain any of the alliances that we have created.
I know that sometimes in the past, there have been members who have striven to get me to explain some of the alliances that I had made (persons that I put in my trust network), and many times, I refused to go down that path - because I did not consider it necessary for me to go into details regarding the basis for my supporting (trusting) one member or another. For sure, members are all over the place in terms of the extent to which they get caught up in various kinds of meta-drama... and I cannot even second-guess some of that judgement, but only attempt to figure out the level of involvement (or not) that is comfortable for me at any given time in my own life and forum balances.