Yeah I read the whole topic and evidence that you provided in my opinion its simply not enough to tag him, at least for me and looking at that topic other DT members that were commenting there came to the same conclusion.
If you really think that he is scammer protecting his own scam website by eliminating competition, you should leave him negative feedback.
Could you please help point out where there is a clear connection between him and the said scam site in the linked post you shared. I am trying to connect the dots, but failed.
Yeah same here. All we got there is circumstantial evidence at best but nothing clar that would make me tag that user.