But seriously, it would be good for the organizers of the competitions, like Roobet to reconsider the concept of the competitions. Indeed, it is almost impossible to compete with strong artists. Maybe evaluate the idea (or other parameters, for example, the atmosphere of the art or the emotions it evokes) of the art more than the artistic performance?
The art competition is open to all and why would they set such perimeter which restricts good artist to participate? To contrary the best one should actually win the competition and if the team liked his art then it's completely fine.There are total of ten winners and you could see many different one on the list.You can also try giving something really cool and have a chance to win the rewards.I would also say the real competition comes with great artist and it will improve your work and provides motivation to be better.
You are right and it is impossible to discriminate (following the example of sanctions and severe restrictions due to residence in a certain country) based on the level of proficiency in artistic skills (following the example of sanctions and severe restrictions due to residence in a certain country). I admit my mistake. My delusion was based on the fact that it is difficult for me to compete with strong artists in competitions such as Roobet art contest. You are also right that prize-winning places should be occupied by the strongest. Now I see only one way to be able to resist the skills of the winners - it is to improve their own skills. There doesn't seem to be any other options here.