.... the whole CH4 argument as to it causing any "climate change" at all is even more unsupported with rigorous science than the CO2 fraud that has become a politicised juggernaut

... CH4 is quite a bit heavier than air and rarely gets above any significant height where it can change the atmospheric solar radiative absorbtion balance ... not only that it has a much faster cycle than CO2 and any changes increases/decreases are backgrounded into earth's other natural processes in 15-20 years

.... the massive topsoil layer of the Great Plains was the result of millenia of grazing bovines (buffalo) eating grass and depositing manure into the soil, this is an obvious net CO2 SINK out of the atmosphere into the soil, grazing stock are net carbon sinks even if you accept CH4 can have a net effect on radiative balance ( which it doesnt)

... methane beat up is just another manufactured hysterical crisis to exert more control over your lives, first it was energy (CO2) lies and now CH4 lies. ...  it's all tidily lining up for up of control the means of transport, production and food which is straight out of the communist playbook

... I'm not saying the commies are behind it but when you get more and more shaky, shitty science coming out of the same field (atmospheric sciences) then it's looking a lot like they are under the sway of some kind of political influence or political confirmation biases

... and look around you for the economic results, the evidence is looking a lot like a communist disaster zone that we've observed in many other countries that go down that crazy sociological path to devastation and ruin ... except it's now on a global scale