That's right Solana is good, but there are still many obstacles. The frequent offline network on Solana makes investors panic, this problem has often happened on the Solana network, for my personal opinion for the long term of course I choose Polygon Matic for now because the supply of coins is limited and costs cheap transactions and also a fairly fast network.
Polygon also experienced a network outage with the recent upgrade pushed by the project's developers. People weren't able to use MATIC for more than 10 hours, putting its reliability in question. It's no wonder why Ethereum is still the "King of De-Fi" even if other chains promise faster and cheaper transactions. Security/reliability/decentralization comes first in order to make the Blockchain work as intended. Without prioritizing this, you'd get nothing more than an unstable system that's flawed by design (similar to centralized payment processors).
Solana may be the fastest (and possibly the cheapest) smart contract platform in the world, but its security is terrible compared to Polygon (MATIC). I'd choose MATIC over SOL anytime just because it's much more secure and reliable. But there's always a risk, so I'd advise anyone to proceed with caution. Just my opinion
