To be fair, this has little to do with NFTs, and more to do with people being fat-thumbed millennials. If you send 444 Bitcoins to someone when you intended to send 444 sats, you'd be just as fucked.
technically... with the 200-week moving average reaching $20,500, it might be reasonable to assert that 44 BTC are worth around $1 million... even though spot price you could get right around double the price... interesting.. spot price is around double the 200-week moving average.
Also, listing the NFT for a $1 million shows the price the fat-fingered shitcoiner had wanted for the NFT, but does not mean that he would get $1million for it.
I have a lot of confidence that I could get pretty damned close to $1 million if I had 22 BTC that I were to want to sell, but if I am trying to play longer term, I would consider those 22 BTC to have much higher value.. so I would likely ONLY shave off a small portion.. maybe if I was desperate, I might shave off 2BTC, and that would surely be pushing the matter because in accordance with Gresham's law, I should be looking around for other possible ways to accomplish my goals.. Oh. and considering the 200-week moving average, in my state of hypothetical desperation, I may well have to limit my maximum sale of BTC to about 12% of the 200-week moving average value, which would be 22 BTC x $20,500 = $451,000 which would be $54,120 (12% of $451k) - and at today's BTC price that would be a maximum of 1.32 BTC shaven off for emergency purposes - and likely that would be my BTC shaving off allowance for a whole year and I would have to wait a year if I feel like I need to tap into BTC again. Too conservative? Perhaps? perhaps?
Right now, in real life I have been spending quite a lot of money in recent times (even going back in the last year), and I am not even really coming close to my yearly BTC withdrawal limitations.