If that is possible, that is even better!

They made the matter even worse after 'explaining'.  People started to identify Bitcoin with illicit activities and actors and it never got censored.  Not directly on the blockchain anyway.

This is a VERY dangerous model and the more censorship there is on the surface and externally, the more they will try to invade Bitcoin's decentralized and uncensored manner.  I am against illicit activities too.  So?  I am still against censorship.  And I would never accept a version of the Bitcoin blockchain that censors illicit transactions.  Not because I want them to exist, but because this is a precedent.  Give them an inch and they will take miles.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG