Unfortunately, anyone who joins the 1xbit signature campaign automatically receives a negative trust. I think that 1xbit campaign manager would be very happy to accept users with a positive or at least neutral trust to the campaign, but no one wants to risk make their rank worse.
Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds. So it seems to me that no good intentional forum member would support such a website, which has hundreds of complaints against it. 1xbit until they can avoid this scamming purpose and will be interested in increasing their own reputation until no reputed member joins their signature campaign.
i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam