I already quoted and described what I considered to be patronizing.. and presumptuous... It's your choice about whether you can "handle" the interaction or if you just want to preach to us and have us all kiss your feet.  You are not the ONLY one who has those kinds of expectations.


Yes.. nothing wrong with your opinion, your methods or even the combination of those - except that you said we need to learn your system... and from my perspective, that is patronizing... and presumptuous.


Good for you for stopping your reading of my post and getting emotional about what I had said up to that point.  

I have no problem with your sharing your ideas, your analysis, your rendition of facts, your description of methods or whatever else you want to share, but if you are going to tell us that you are smarter than the rest of us, then I will likely respond (in similar ways as I already did) to those kinds of assertions.. whether your assertions are true or not...

By the way, I saw that other members had made some responses that were similar to my later response... that involved concerns regarding aspects of the meaning/complexities.. and not necessarily denying your correctness but instead questioning how easy the presentation was understood...  but instead of getting the hint that maybe you could attempt to dumb it down a wee bit, you largely referred to us as lazy dumbies who need to get up to speed regarding your purported brilliance... ...and I am not even denying that you may well be brilliant beyond the capacities of mortals and/or bots.