[edited out]
What is accusing one of patronizing others? Is that not attack of my character?
Sure... I suppose that saying that you are patronizing and presumptuous in some aspects of your posted contents could go to your character, too.. but initially, I was only intending to make comments about the way you had posted in ways that seemed to postulate that you were smarter than the rest of us, which seemed to presume aspects of our intelligence and our motivations (lack thereof, mostly).. so I do not need to repeat what I had already posted several times.. and I don't delete any of my posts.. Usually, I do not edit my posts either.. except maybe within minutes of posting them.... .. so to the extent anything that I may have said is relevant, you can go back and look.. I don't go back and look too often either.. not even when some dweeb is trying to make some kind of drama about something that I may have said at one point or another. .blah blah blah.. and yeah.. I am referring to you as a dweeb too.. because you are surely seeming to rise to the definition of such... getting worse (devolving) with each post, so it seems.

ALSO, YOU are the one ASSUMING I have made a claim of my method being superior to yours or anyone else's. I made no such claim on BitCoinTalk. Have I on OTHER platforms? Yes... Here? No...
I was just going based on what you said.
No, not my goal for you to click my links. IF one is interested in the indicators and how to use them, then sure, be my guest... Am I hurt if no one clicks them? Hell no... I'm perfectly fine with that.
Sure, there are valid ways to use outside links, even to one's own content outside of the forum. I suppose. I don't claim to be an expert... many of us will link to a variety of outside references, and even though mostly not our own content, there are some guys who link to their own content from time to time..
However, I abhor tadpoles such as yourself who think they know every damn thing and make false groundless claims about others.
I doubt that I hold myself out as knowing everything.. but sometimes members do get that impression.. whether they are trolls or not, I am not sure.
However, YOUR goal is to try to fish your damn way out of your poor excuse of a human being behavior.
I question how you could be able to reasonably assess my goals to be the way that you characterized them to be. Surely, you are entitled to your opinion, even if seemingly a wee bit out there.
Ohhhhh, aren't we the "non-emotional" one... LOL...
Mostly.. yep.
what a freaking joke... Always divert attention from your own damn short comings. A typical tadpole...
Well, sure there might be tactics to attempt to cause topics to become less personal, even when others might seem to be striving to make them personal. So I suppose diversion might be one of them that sometimes might work pretty well. Seems kind of irrelevant that if you call me a name, then to deny it and call you a name.. does not seem to get us very far, but i am not above calling members names from time to time... especially when they seem to have justified such... just like I called you a dweeb above.. and probably you could be called a cry baby or a whiner, and maybe even take over the title from some other member(s) that have been much more chill in their emotional outbursts recently.. including the deleting of posts does not come off as very emotionally sound behavior and might even deserve a name for that kind of conduct.. it's the taking my marbles and going home approach to the forum. hahahahaha.. we (royal) have seen that before, too.