If you are not accepting accounts with negative feedback in your campaign, then how do you explain this:
~.~
The answer is quite simple, (I think that probably) everyone you were kind to mention was accepted in the first campaign where there was no such condition yet. Due to the fact that they took part in first campaign (me too), they all got a red trust. This condition was provided in the second and each subsequent campaign.
What a bunch of bullsh*t. At least check the facts before you make such stupid statements.
Most of these accounts received negative ratings long before 1xbit launched its campaigns here. Check the dates.
Furthermore, I specifically cited ratings that are not related to 1xbit. This is the exact opposite of what 1xbit_official said.
We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.
What can we expect from a company that can't even follow its own rules?
And of course, 1xbit_official will again remain silent and rely on their paid shills to speak on their behalf. As usual.