⭐ Merited by Rikafip (1)
Sup fellas (big lol again)
As I stated above, I started cleaning DECENT topic with much enthusiasm. The topic was not full of spam, nor used bumping services, therefore it was harder to clean it than I expected. Most of the reported posts were made by frustrated users, probably because they bought high and the coin dumped. So far I made 1237 reports, all but 1 handled already. This means that I reduced the topic with 61-62 pages. However, the topic is reduced now with 199 pages and this was possible only due to Welsh, which worked in par with me, and deleted 137 pages on his own. Thank you Welsh for the big help! We can say that's Decent enough (pun intended
).
I parsed all posts made from most recent until page 299 (which contains posts from June 2017) and my intention was go keep parsing until the date of Jan 1st, 2017, being afraid to have my reports flagged as bad, for reporting posts too old, if I would have gone beyond that date.
However, something happened and for the moment I will stop here, as I need some information from Welsh.
The problem is that 11 out of my last 13 reports were flagged as bad although, in my opinion, they should be deleted.
The posts in question are the following:
- post made by vincentcm: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866553#msg19866553
- post made by SwapStick: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866612#msg19866612
- post made by vincentcm: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866719#msg19866719
- post made by nathalie20: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866749#msg19866749
- post made by SwapStick: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868122#msg19868122
- post made by Hunterwolfie: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868179#msg19868179
- post made by Marvell1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868350#msg19868350
- post made by Hunterwolfie: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19870134#msg19870134
- post made by Number 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19870311#msg19870311
- post made by nathalie20: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19871774#msg19871774
- post made by https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19872044#msg19872044
As you can see, all are similar to previous reports I made from this topic; most of them contain swearing or zero value; and all previous similar reports were flagged as Good. As a consequence, I am thinking (1) this is either a mistake from the mod which handled these reports; or, (2) another mod and not you handled them and considered them too old and flagged them all as bad, which was my main fear, as I wrote above, but this was for posts older than Jan 1st 2017 and, as you can see these are from Jun 2017.
@Welsh if you agree, I can dig more inside this topic, even earlier than the date of Jan 1st, 2017, but I am afraid that I can have my reports marked as bad if I keep making reports. I mean, in case my reports will come to you, I believe you'll mark them as good, but maybe they will arrive in another mod's hand? (I'm saying that thinking that these bad reports where flagged as bad not by you, but by another mod; even so, do you have any idea why they were flagged as bad?) However, in case we can make an agreement, thus just you will take care of this thread, I am more than willing to dig also through the posts made earlier than Jun 9th, 2017, and also earlier than Jan 1st, 2017. Please let me know.
The posts made until Jan 1st, 2017, reach page 232 of the topic, thus I could still parse 67 pages more. However, I need to know how to proceed, as I don't want to end up having my next ~1000 reports flagged as bad (I calculated 20 posts per page multiplied by 67 pages of posts made between June 9th, 2017 and Jan 1st, 2017 and the result is 1340 posts; however, not all of them need to be reported, this being why I estimated that I'll probably made 1000 more reports from these pages).
In case another mod handled these reports as bad not by mistake, but because he considered the posts too old, I think that best approach would be here -- if possible -- to send a note to your mod colleagues and tell them to leave all the reports from this thread to be handled by you. At least, you know what is happening with this thread and why these reports appear, for such old posts. And it's happening because we discussed to clean this monster topic as well. I am more than willing to clean it entirely, but also I would not want to have 1000 bad reports in a row...
I'll keep it under watch, but when I opened it first time it was clean
I opened it when you mentioned it. And now, days later, it's still clean.
As I stated above, I started cleaning DECENT topic with much enthusiasm. The topic was not full of spam, nor used bumping services, therefore it was harder to clean it than I expected. Most of the reported posts were made by frustrated users, probably because they bought high and the coin dumped. So far I made 1237 reports, all but 1 handled already. This means that I reduced the topic with 61-62 pages. However, the topic is reduced now with 199 pages and this was possible only due to Welsh, which worked in par with me, and deleted 137 pages on his own. Thank you Welsh for the big help! We can say that's Decent enough (pun intended
).I parsed all posts made from most recent until page 299 (which contains posts from June 2017) and my intention was go keep parsing until the date of Jan 1st, 2017, being afraid to have my reports flagged as bad, for reporting posts too old, if I would have gone beyond that date.
However, something happened and for the moment I will stop here, as I need some information from Welsh.
The problem is that 11 out of my last 13 reports were flagged as bad although, in my opinion, they should be deleted.
The posts in question are the following:
- post made by vincentcm: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866553#msg19866553
- post made by SwapStick: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866612#msg19866612
- post made by vincentcm: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866719#msg19866719
- post made by nathalie20: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19866749#msg19866749
- post made by SwapStick: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868122#msg19868122
- post made by Hunterwolfie: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868179#msg19868179
- post made by Marvell1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19868350#msg19868350
- post made by Hunterwolfie: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19870134#msg19870134
- post made by Number 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19870311#msg19870311
- post made by nathalie20: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19871774#msg19871774
- post made by https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg19872044#msg19872044
As you can see, all are similar to previous reports I made from this topic; most of them contain swearing or zero value; and all previous similar reports were flagged as Good. As a consequence, I am thinking (1) this is either a mistake from the mod which handled these reports; or, (2) another mod and not you handled them and considered them too old and flagged them all as bad, which was my main fear, as I wrote above, but this was for posts older than Jan 1st 2017 and, as you can see these are from Jun 2017.
@Welsh if you agree, I can dig more inside this topic, even earlier than the date of Jan 1st, 2017, but I am afraid that I can have my reports marked as bad if I keep making reports. I mean, in case my reports will come to you, I believe you'll mark them as good, but maybe they will arrive in another mod's hand? (I'm saying that thinking that these bad reports where flagged as bad not by you, but by another mod; even so, do you have any idea why they were flagged as bad?) However, in case we can make an agreement, thus just you will take care of this thread, I am more than willing to dig also through the posts made earlier than Jun 9th, 2017, and also earlier than Jan 1st, 2017. Please let me know.
The posts made until Jan 1st, 2017, reach page 232 of the topic, thus I could still parse 67 pages more. However, I need to know how to proceed, as I don't want to end up having my next ~1000 reports flagged as bad (I calculated 20 posts per page multiplied by 67 pages of posts made between June 9th, 2017 and Jan 1st, 2017 and the result is 1340 posts; however, not all of them need to be reported, this being why I estimated that I'll probably made 1000 more reports from these pages).
In case another mod handled these reports as bad not by mistake, but because he considered the posts too old, I think that best approach would be here -- if possible -- to send a note to your mod colleagues and tell them to leave all the reports from this thread to be handled by you. At least, you know what is happening with this thread and why these reports appear, for such old posts. And it's happening because we discussed to clean this monster topic as well. I am more than willing to clean it entirely, but also I would not want to have 1000 bad reports in a row...
What do you think about this thread [ANN][PX][PRESALE] ProtocolX Decentralized Trading Protocol on BSC [METAVERSE]⚡⚡? Their thread started to get infested by the bumping accounts on the list referred above as well as several bumping accounts tagged by lovesmayfamilis
I'll keep it under watch, but when I opened it first time it was clean
I opened it when you mentioned it. And now, days later, it's still clean.