Actually, the advice is good, but not posssible to introduce due to 1xBit policy and past situation on Bitcointalk.
1 - 1xBit is fully anonymous and will remain so, so for sure no one will be asked for KYC verification (However I admit that I would prefer the verification to be. Hopefully this will change someday and help eliminate a lot of misunderstanding.)
this: "
1xBit is fully anonymous ", I wonder if they are protecting customers or are they hiding from the authorities? it's not possible that they prefer to receive negative feedback here on the forum and have a bad reputation and still not accept giving data from people who supposedly they think are lying even when the account owners themselves have allowed them to give their data to DT members evaluate the data that the security team of that site has that proves that certain customers are cheating.
To tell the truth, I don't know what their goals are, but the explanation seems to make sense (about anonimity):
That would surely lift most of the complaints off, but back in 2015 our intentions were to make as anonymous casino as possible (when crypto and all that stuff appeared).
Ain't much changed since then - we added email KYC and that's all what have changed about anonymity.
Despite the fact that if someone would like to, he could probably buy an identity, as I wrote, the implementation of the KYC requirement would definitely solve a lot complaints. Probably, 1xbit analysts judge it differently.